This is the data set for Working Paper 371 which analyzes correspondence letters to The Lancet and summarizes and categorizes common areas of dispute raised in these letters. The authors describe the five concerns most frequently cited in correspondence letters and make several recommendations, including better documentation of areas of potential bias with checklists and guidelines to facilitate more rigorous peer review, drawing on experts with econometric expertise as reviewers, and explicitly and thoroughly linking all correspondence letters to the original articles in The Lancet.
This data set is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license. You are free to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes only, with attribution given the Center for Global Development, preferably with a link to this page. Resulting work must be distributed under the same license or one similar.
Commercial use of this work requires prior written permission. Please email email@example.com to pursue this option or for other uses beyond the terms of this license.